Modified Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Method combining peritoneal anchoring with anterior rectus sheath fixation

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
 
Modified Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Method combining peritoneal anchoring with anterior rectus sheath fixation

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Keiichiro
Matsumoto
Keiichiro Matsumoto matsumoto-ke@koseikan.jp Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan Nephrology Saga Japan *
Makoto Fukuda makotennis@gmail.com Saga University Nephrology Saga Japan -
Koh Imoto kesrum621711@gmail.com Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan Nephrology Saga Japan -
Mayuri Kanbayashi kamb626gas@gmail.com Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan Nephrology Saga Japan -
Hana Matsuoka matsuoka8734@gmail.com Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan Nephrology Saga Japan -
Megumi Nakamura nakamum5@yahoo.co.jp Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan Nephrology Saga Japan -
Kohei Hashimoto frogman1.03@gmail.com Saga University Nephrology Saga Japan -
Motoaki Miyazono miyazono@edu.cc.saga-u.ac.jp Saga University Nephrology Saga Japan -
Maki Yoshihara y.maki129@gmail.com Saga University Nephrology Saga Japan -
-
-
-
-
-
-

Catheter malfunction—migration, inflow/outflow failure, and early technical failure—remains a key barrier to sustained peritoneal dialysis (PD). Laparoscopic placement improves visualization yet does not fully prevent malposition. We developed a device-free, easily reproducible dual-fixation modification that combines peritoneal anchoring with direct suturing of the first cuff to the anterior rectus sheath, aiming to enhance tip stability without special equipment or advanced maneuvers.

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 82 consecutive PD catheter implantations (August 2020–September 2024). Patients were assigned to a conventional method (n=68) or the modified dual-fixation method (n=14). Outcomes included operative time, need for reinsertion or abdominal wall fixation, catheter migration/malposition, and early complications. Categorical variables were compared with χ²/Fisher’s exact tests and continuous variables with the Mann–Whitney U test; p<0.05 was considered significant.

Baseline characteristics were comparable. Laparoscopic assistance was used more often in the modified group (85.7% vs. 44.1%, p=0.007). Operative time was shorter with the modified method: median 92 [83–106] min vs. 99 [85–116] min; p=0.005. No patient in the modified group required catheter reinsertion, additional abdominal wall fixation, or reoperation. There were no migration/malposition events observed after the modified procedure during the recorded follow-up. Catheter removal occurred less frequently in the modified group (7.1% vs. 26.5%), without statistical significance (p=0.171). Exit-site relocation was uncommon and similar between groups (ns). No suture-related complications were recorded in the modified cohort.

This dual-fixation approach—peritoneal anchoring plus anterior rectus sheath cuff suturing—provides a simple, equipment-free, and reproducible modification to standard PD catheter implantation. It reduces operative time and showed no need for secondary fixation or reinsertion in our series, with a favorable (though not always statistically significant) profile for catheter stability. Larger, multicenter studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm durability and generalizability.

Kewords