STAGE-DEPENDENT PATTERN OF F2-ISOPROSTANES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/71bc0a8e4cef8e79776d09bcc3f39485.pdf
STAGE-DEPENDENT PATTERN OF F2-ISOPROSTANES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Raeni Dwi
Putri
Lukman Pura lukman23003@mail.unpad.ac.id Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran Doctoral Study Program of Medical Sciences Bandung Indonesia -
Raeni Dwi Putri reraeni@gmail.com Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran Master Study Program of Biomedical Sciencces Bandung Indonesia *
Alvin Aulia Ahmad Fauzie alvinauliaaf@gmail.com Oto Iskandar Dinata Regional General Hospital Department of Emergency Bandung Indonesia -
Hasani Farhan hasanifarhan.md@gmail.com Dr. H. Abdul Moeloek Regional General Hospital Uro-Nephrology Bandar Lampung Indonesia -
Muh. Arya Prahmana muharyaprahmana@gmail.com Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran Master Study Program of Biomedical Sciencces Bandung Indonesia -
Ahmad Faried ahmad.faried@unpad.ac.id Universitas Padjadjaran/Unpad University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery and Stem Cell Working Group Jatinangor Indonesia -
Ria Bandiara ria.bandiara@unpad.ac.id Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine Bandung Indonesia -
Rudi Supriyadi rudi.supriyadi@unpad.ac.id Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine Bandung Indonesia -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Oxidative stress drives chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. F2-isoprostane as a stable product of free-radical lipid peroxidation, is the most specific and reliable indicator of in-vivo oxidative injury. F2-isoprostane is chemically stable and not confounded by dietary lipid intake or enzymatic formation. Yet individual CKD studies reported mixed results, with some showing significant elevations in F2-isoprostanes and others finding non-significant differences. To resolve this uncertainty, we conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis on F2-isoprostanes, quantifying stage-dependent patterns across CKD and renal replacement modalities.

We conducted comprehensive searches on PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Cochrane from inception to October 2025. Eligible studies compared plasma and/or urine F2-isoprostanes between adults with CKD (non-dialysis or dialysis) and healthy controls using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data were extracted using standardized form. Random-effects models pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs).

Our search identified 1,546 records. After screening and selection, 33 studies were included. There were 2,189 participants with CKD and 1,205 controls. Plasma F2-isoprostanes were significantly higher in CKD than controls (SMD = 1.93; 95% CI 1.39–2.48; P < 0.0001; I² = 97%). Sub-group analysis by assay method for ELISA and GC-MS reduced heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Pooled means by group indicated higher plasma concentrations in CKD than controls for both ELISA (CKD ⟨309.3 pg/mL, 95% CI 259.25-359.35⟩; controls ⟨121.27, 95% CI 103.51-139.02 ⟩) and GC-MS (CKD ⟨43.1 pg/mL, 95% CI 40.51-45.68 ⟩; controls ⟨2.97, 95% CI 2.61-3.37⟩).

Stage 3 pooled mean plasma concentration was 313 pg/mL (95% CI 100–526), and the pooled mean increased to 638 (95% CI 394–882) in Stage 4. For Stage 5, the pooled mean was 441 pg/mL (95% CI 301–582) by ELISA and 13.2 pg/mL (95% CI 11.1–15.3) by GC-MS.

Treatment-modality subgrouping by pre-dialysis, mixed (pre-dialysis and dialysis), dialysis, and transplantation only reduced the heterogeneity to I² = 79.6%. Pooled means plasma concentration were 392.2 (95% CI 303.7–480.6) in pre-dialysis, 397.6 (95% CI 312.3–482.8) in hemodialysis (HD), and 430.02 pg/mL in peritoneal dialysis (PD) (95% CI -8.5-868.5) analyzed by ELISA. Pooled means plasma concentration were 207.6 (95% CI 120.9–293.5) in pre-dialysis, 21.64 (95% CI 19.31-23.96) in HD analyzed by GC-MS, and 128.963 pg/mL (95% CI 63.27-192.5) in transplantation analyzed by ELISA and GC-MS 

Urinary analysis showed higher F2-isoprostanes in CKD than controls (SMD -0.52; 95% CI -2.89-1,85; I² = 96%; P = 0.67). Pooled means within the urine were 0.598 ng/mg creatinine; 95% CI 0.16-1.02 in CKD compared with 0.402; 95% CI 0.27-0.53 in controls.

Figure 1. Forest plot of plasma F2-isoprostanes comparison in CKD versus healthy controls with assay method subgroup analysis by ELISA and GC-MS.

Figure 2. Forest plots of pooled mean plasma F2-isoprostanes among (A) CKD group, and (B) Healthy controls group analyzed by ELISA.

Figure 3. Forest plots of pooled mean plasma F2-isoprostanes among (A) CKD group, and (B) Healthy controls group analyzed by GC-MS.

Figure 4. Forest plots of plasma F2-isoprostanes across different CKD stages, (A) Stage 3, (B) Stage 4, (C) Stage 5 analyzed by ELISA, and (D) Stage 5 analyzed by GC-MS.

Figure 5. Forest plot of plasma F2-isoprostanes comparison in CKD versus healthy controls with treatment modality subgroup analysis for pre-dialysis only, mixed pre-dialysis and dialysis, dialysis only, and transplantation only.

Figure 6. Forest plots of Plasma F2-isoprostanes across different treatment modalities (A) Pre-dialysis, (B) HD, and (C) PD  analyzed by ELISA.Figure 7. Forest plots of plasma F2-isoprostanes across different treatment modalities (A) Pre-dialysis, (B) HD  analyzed by ELISA, and (C) Transplantation analyzed by ELISA and GC-MS.

Plasma F2-isoprostanes are significantly elevated in CKD, with a rise from Stage 3 to 4 and attenuation at Stage 5 while remaining above healthy levels. On ELISA, pre-dialysis and HD showed comparable plasma levels, with PD appearing higher. On GC-MS, pre-dialysis exceeded plasma level of those with HD and post-transplantation. Urinary F2-isoprostanes were higher in CKD but not statistically significant.

Kewords