Low-Dose, Short-Course Corticosteroids Combined with Delayed Mycophenolate Mofetil is Safer for Treating IgA Nephropathy

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
 
Low-Dose, Short-Course Corticosteroids Combined with Delayed Mycophenolate Mofetil is Safer for Treating IgA Nephropathy

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Yi
Xiong
Yi Xiong xy17231106@163.com The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University Department of Nephrology Nanchang China *
Yang Yang yyang0628@outlook.com The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University Department of Nephrology Nanchang China -
Wenjun Yan yanwenjun2000@126.com the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University Department of Nephrology Ganzhou China -
Kaiping Luo 15807075858@163.com Ganzhou People's Hospital Department of Nephrology Ganzhou China -
Baoqin Zhou 18279089183@163.com Xinyu People's Hospital, Jiangxi Province Department of Nephrology Xinyu China -
Lijuan Wang 598223569@qq.com ShangRao People's Hospital Department of Nephrology Shangrao China -
Shizhang , Xu 380746203@qq.com he People's Hospital of Yichun City Department of Nephrology Yichun China -
Daijin Ren 15779729873@163.com Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Dpartment of Health Management Center Nanchang China -
Yebei LI yebei333@163.com The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Dpartment of Health Management Center Nanchang China -
Gaosi Xu gaosixu@163.com The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University Department of Nephrology Nanchang China -
 
 
 
 
 

Although the efficacy of low-dose corticosteroids (CS) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in treating IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has been established, safety remains a concern. Whether the regimen of low-dose, short-course CS combined with delayed MMF initiation can reduce adverse events while maintaining good efficacy remains elusive.

This multi-center, retrospective study included 160 adults with biopsy-proven IgAN in Jiangxi Province, China (Jan 2022-Jun 2023), with a follow-up period of 18 months. Key inclusion criteria were persistent urinary protein (UP) ≥ 0.75 g/day despite renin-angiotensin system blockade for 1-month and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m². Patients were assigned to two groups: the delayed MMF group (n=79) received low-dose, short-course CS (a total of three months, initially 0.4-0.6 mg/kg/day, reducing by 20% every two weeks, and maintained at 0.1 mg/kg/day), with MMF (1.25-1.5 g/day for six months and subsequently maintained at 0.75-1.0 g/day until follow-up finished) introduced only when the CS dose reached 0.2-0.3 mg/kg/day; the Recommended MMF group (n=81) started both CS and MMF initiated concurrently from the outset, following the same dosing and tapering schedules as above. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1, caliper=0.2) adjusted for age, gender, eGFR, UP, and MESTC score, yielding 63 balanced pairs.

After PSM, both groups showed comparable clinical and pathological characteristics (all P >0.05, Table 1). Efficacy outcomes were not significantly different (Table 2). Specifically, the CR rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were similar (at 6-month: 30.2% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.845; at 12-month: 44.4% vs. 39.7%, P = 0.588; at 18-month: 57.7% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.875). The OR rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were also comparable (at 6-month: 58.7% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.371; at 12-month: 77.8% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.676; at 18-month: 81.0% vs. 81.0%, P = 1.000, Table 2). Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed no difference in cumulative CR (P = 0.730, Figure 2B), OR (P = 0.630, Figure 2D), or composite event-free survival (P = 0.640, Figure 2F).

Subgroup analyses across key baseline characteristics generally revealed no significant interactions between treatment assignment and most subgroups, except for T. T1 was associated with HR = 1.54 (95% CI: 0.79-3.00). A significant interaction was observed (P = 0.003). Furthermore, longitudinal data revealed comparable improvements in UP, ALB, and eGFR between both groups over the 18-month follow-up, with no significant intergroup differences (P = 0.835 for UP, P = 0.922 for ALB, P = 0.051 for eGFR; Figure 4). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed that the treatment group was not associated with CR (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.55-1.34, P = 0.513, Table 3). Regarding Safety, the Delayed MMF group had a significantly lower incidence of total AEs (44.4% vs 63.5%, P = 0.032) and notably fewer infections (28.6% vs 50.8%, P = 0.011, Table 4).

Table 1: Clinical and pathologic features of participants at baseline before and after propensity score matching

Characteristics

The full cohort (n = 160)

The matched cohort (n = 126)

Delayed group

(n = 79)

Recommended group (n = 81)

 

P value

 

Delayed group

(n = 63)

Recommended group (n = 63)

 

P value

 

Men

44 (55.7)

37 (45.7)

0.211

33 (52.4)

34 (54.0)

0.858

Asian

79

81

-

63

63

-

Age (y)

39.3 ± 12.3

40.1 ± 13.1

0.693

39.1 ± 12.0

39.7 ± 13.4

0.806

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

120.8 ± 24.7

124.1 ± 23.2

0.389

121.8 ± 25.6

124.9 ± 23.9

0.484

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

76.0 ± 19.0

77.9 ± 15.4

0.489

76.5 ± 19.4

77.8 ± 15.4

0.670

eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2)

67.8 (46.7 to 93.4)

65.2 (46.4 to 76.7)

0.527

67.0 (46.7 to 82.4)

65.8 (53.2 to 77.8)

1.000

Urine protein (g/d)

2.2 (1.3 to 3.1)

1.8 (1.2 to 2.8)

0.058

2.6 (1.3 to 3.1)

1.9 (1.3 to 2.8)

0.372

< 2g/d

31 (39.2)

45 (55.6)

0.039

24 (38.1)

32 (50.8)

0.151

≥ 2g/d

48 (60.8)

36 (44.4)

-

39 (61.9)

31 (49.2)

-

ALB (g/L)

41.3 (38.0 to 43.6)

39.4 (36.6 to 42.7)

0.058

41.3 (37.3 to 43.6)

39.5 (36.8 to 43.1)

0.154

RASB under follow-up

79

81

-

63

63

-

CCB under follow-up

3 (3.8)

4 (4.9)

1.000

3 (3.8)

4 (4.9)

1.000

β-receptor antagonists under follow-up

4 (5.1)

6 (7.4)

0.746

4 (5.1)

6 (7.4)

0.746

Diuretic under follow-up

2 (2.5)

2 (2.5)

1.000

2 (2.5)

2 (2.5)

1.000

M1

74 (93.7)

80 (98.8)

0.115

62 (98.4)

62 (98.4)

1.000

E1

20 (25.3)

27 (33.3)

0.266

16 (25.4)

22 (34.9)

0.244

S1

64 (81.0)

63 (77.8)

0.613

54 (85.7)

52 (82.5)

0.626

T1-2

38 (48.1)

39 (48.2)

1.000

31 (49.2)

32 (50.8)

0.984

C1-2

48 (60.8)

43 (53.1)

0.381

38 (60.3)

37 (58.7)

0.856

Notes: Values for categorical variables were given as count (percentage); values for continuous variables, as mean ± standard deviation or median (IQR).

Abbreviations: ALB, albumin; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RASB, renin-angiotensin system blockers; CCB, calcium channel blocke.

Table 2: Primary and secondary outcome in this study before and after propensity score matching

Outcome

The full cohort (n = 180)

The matched cohort (n = 126)

Delayed group (n = 79)

Recommended group (n = 81)

 

P value

 

Delayed group
(n = 63)

Recommended group (n = 63)

 

P
value

 

Primary outcome

 

 

 

 

 

 

CR at month 6

24 (30.4)

22 (27.2)

0.653

19 (30.2)

18 (28.6)

0.845

  CR at month 12

35 (44.3)

30 (37.0)

0.349

28 (44.4)

25 (39.7)

0.588

  CR at month 18

46 (58.2)

43 (53.1)

0.513

37 (57.7)

36 (57.1)

0.875

Secondary outcome

 

 

 

 

 

 

  OR at month 6

47 (59.5)

43 (53.1)

0.414

37 (58.7)

32 (50.8)

0.371

  OR at month 12

62 (78.5)

60 (74.1)

0.513

49 (77.8)

47 (74.6)

0.676

  OR at month 18

64 (81.0)

65 (80.2)

0.902

51 (81.0)

51 (81.0)

1.000

  Combined event

 

 

 

 

 

 

    eGFR decrease 30% (ml/min/1.73m2)

2 (2.5)

2 (2.5)

1.000

1 (1.6)

1 (1.6)

1.000

    Onset of ESRD

1 (2.5)

3 (3.7)

1.000

The regimen of low-dose, short-course CS with delayed MMF initiation demonstrates similar efficacy as the recommended immediate MMF regimen, significantly alleviating the burden of adverse events and lowering the risk of infections for IgAN patients.

Kewords