Back
For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".
To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".
During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center.
Preparing your E-Poster
Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.
E-Poster Submission Deadline
Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.
Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.
Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.
The number of patients living with kidney disease is increasing worldwide, meanwhile the number of nephrologists decreases significantly as well as the number of students interested in pursuing nephrology as their specialty. Some identified reasons for not choosing nephrology are the lack of contact with the specialty during academic training, nephrology complexity and that there aren’t innovative techniques to teach the subject. The aim of this study is to examine and describe the characteristics of nephrology courses within our local context
This study employs a cross-sectional descriptive observational design, using a digital survey (Google Forms) to collect data on demographic characteristics, educational experiences, and specialization preferences related to nephrology among medical students assigned to the Regional General Hospital 46 (Hospital General Regional 46).
A total of 228 medical students were invited to conduct an electronic survey via WhatsApp. 22% answers were received. The range of age for the majority of the students’ is between 20-24 years (88%), 58% students are women. The students belong to four different universities. Only 72% of students reported to have the subject of nephrology included in their university program. 53% and 47% reported that the duration of the nephrology course was less than two months and one semester respectively.
Regarding the nephrology course, students provided feedback on several aspects. About the time dedicated to the subject of nephrology, most students perceived that it as either regular (42%) or good (33%). The quality of the course material was rated as good (31%) or very good (31%) by a significant portion of the participants. Students evaluated the nephrology instructors favorably, 33% rating their performance as good and 41.7% as very good. The knowledge gained during the course was considered regular and good by 23% and 47% of students respectively. These results are further illustrated in Graphic 1.
Among the respondents, 88% indicated that they utilized one or more educational resources during their nephrology classes. These resources included presentations, videos, infographics, and virtual sessions, reflecting a diverse approach to learning within the course.
When asked about their interest in further nephrology education, 94% expressed willingness to participate in a nephrology course. However, only 19% showed an interest in pursuing nephrology as their area of specialization. Some students expressed a preference for pursuing other medical specialties over nephrology. Additionally, a portion of the respondents indicated that they do not find the subject of nephrology appealing, which influenced their decision not to select it as their area of specialization.
Results presented hereby show the heterogeneity of nephrology courses during medical training in our local settings. Even though many students showed interest in participating in a nephrology course, just some students will be interested in choosing nephrology as their area of specialization. Strategies should be implemented to improve nephrology courses during medical training. Further evaluation is required to demonstrate if the implementation of a good quality and content nephrology course will modify students’ selection of areas of specialization.
