Back
For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".
To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".
During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center.
Preparing your E-Poster
Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.
E-Poster Submission Deadline
Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.
Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.
Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.
In hemodialysis (HD) patients, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and lower-limb circulatory impairment worsen survival and quality of life, while options are limited and surgical outcomes are poorer than in the general population. Far-infrared (FIR) irradiation is a bedside-feasible adjunct during HD sessions and has been suggested to improve endothelial function and microcirculation; however, its impact on the ankle–brachial index (ABI) over an annual timescale is unclear. We aimed to estimate the effect of FIR on ABI at 12 months and on the annual change in ABI (ΔABI/year) after adjustment for confounding.
Single-center retrospective cohort (July 2023–June 2025) of adult maintenance HD patients with baseline and 12-month ABI. We excluded limbs with major amputation, acute limb ischemia, or missing key covariates. The irradiation group received 30-minute FIR once per HD session for 1 year (adherence ≥80%); controls had no FIR during the target period or prior year. FIR followed the manufacturer’s manual with the emitter ~20 cm from the limb; nursing checks ensured correct placement and uninterrupted delivery. The limb was the unit of analysis; patient-level clustering was addressed. Primary outcomes were ABI at 12 months and ΔABI/year; secondary outcomes were ABI <0.90 and “Responder” (Δ ≥0.10). Main analysis: overlap weighting (OW) with doubly robust (DR) adjustment. Sensitivity: Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW)+DR, propensity score matching (PSM)+DR, mixed-effects (patient random intercept), and a patient-clustered nonparametric bootstrap (500 resamples). Balance used |SMD| ≤0.10. Prespecified covariates: age, sex, diabetes, smoking, systolic blood pressure, baseline ABI, log dialysis vintage, prior endovascular/surgical procedures, and concomitant medications. Approved by the institutional ethics committee (No. 4724); conducted per the Declaration of Helsinki with consent waived via public opt-out.
The analysis included 26 patients (51 limbs) in the irradiation group and 102 patients (199 limbs) in the non-irradiation group. In the main analysis (OW+DR), ABI at 12 months was higher in the FIR group (difference +0.060, 95% CI +0.019 to +0.100), and ΔABI/year was also improved (difference +0.056, 95% CI +0.021 to +0.090). Clustered bootstrap estimate: +0.051 (95% CI −0.006–0.098; P(effect<0)=0.034). Clinically, this corresponded to a 6.03% absolute reduction in ABI <0.90 (NNT 16.6) and an 11.67% absolute increase in Responders (NNT 8.6). Under the final condition, max|SMD| ≤0.10 was achieved; IPTW, PSM+DR, and mixed-effects analyses showed similar trends. No device-related events (low-temperature burns, erythema, discomfort-related discontinuation) occurred.
FIR administered during HD was associated with small-to-moderate improvements in ABI at 12 months and ΔABI/year. An effect of +0.05 to +0.06 may help patients near the ABI 0.90 threshold move into a lower-risk range, suggesting potential utility as a pragmatic adjunct to standard PAD care in HD. While residual confounding in this single-center observational study cannot be excluded, the direction of effect was consistent across multiple approaches. Prospective multicenter studies should evaluate durability, patient-centered outcomes (leg symptoms, walking distance), and cost-effectiveness.