Back
For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".
To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".
During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center.
Preparing your E-Poster
Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.
E-Poster Submission Deadline
Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.
Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.
Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.
Background: Thirty percent of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) cases lack overt albuminuria, delaying diagnosis. We examined whether urinary interleukin‑6 (uIL‑6) identifies DKD and predicts Dapagliflozin response in proteinuric and non-proteinuric phenotypes.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort in Karbala (one endocrinology and two nephrology centers) from July 2021 to December 2024 (42-month follow-up). Adults (≥18) with T2D and early DKD (KDIGO G1–G3) initiated dapagliflozin 10 mg daily; exclusions were non-DKD, active infection, malignancy, pregnancy, and prior SGLT2-inhibitor use. Visits were at baseline and three months; a forty-two-month subset was analyzed. Participants without follow-up were excluded; statistical weighting and data imputation addressed attrition. Midstream spot urine was processed within 1 hour, aliquoted, stored at −80 °C, with a single freeze–thaw permitted; samples with hematuria/pyuria were excluded. Urinary IL-6 was measured in duplicate by sandwich ELISA (Quantikine HS, R&D Systems; analytical range 2–600 ng/L; LOD 1.0 ng/L; intra-/inter-assay CVs <8%/<10%) ;(values <LOD were imputed as LOD/√2; sensitivity analyses indexed uIL-6 to urine creatinine. UACR (mg/g) was assayed on the same specimens; dilution bias was reduced using creatinine and, when available, specific-gravity indexing. A diabetes control cohort was used for ROC analyses. Primary outcomes were ≥20% UACR reduction (P-DKD) and ≥30% uIL-6 reduction (NP-DKD). Statistics: continuous data are mean ±SD or median (IQR); paired t or Wilcoxon as appropriate; Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (q<0.10); multivariable logistic regression for responder status (covariates: age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, SBP, HbA1c, eGFR, UACR); AUROC with 95% bootstrap CIs, Hosmer–Lemeshow calibration, VIF<5, EPV≥10; two-sided p<0.05 (SPSS v26)
Figure1.ROC analysis in NP-DKD comparing uIL-6 vs UACR. Figure2.Early (3 months) and sustained (42 months)responses in uIL-6, UACR, and eGFR.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics by DN phenotype.
Variable
NP-DKD (eGFR-low) (n = 98)
NP-DKD (rapid-decline) (n = 154)
Proteinuric DKD (n = 588)
p value
Hypertension, n (%)
Table 2. Multivariable predictors of treatment response (≥20 % UACR or ≥30 % uIL‑6 reduction).
In this cohort, baseline characteristics differed primarily by kidney injury pattern (Table 1): protein uric DKD had markedly higher UACR and lower eGFR (both p<0.001), whereas age, sex, and hypertension were comparable; uIL-6 differed modestly across groups (p=0.038). Predictors of treatment response (Table 2) showed that higher baseline uIL-6 (OR 1.18 per 10 ng/L, p<0.001) and higher systolic blood pressure (OR 1.07 per 10 mmHg, p=0.03) independently increased the odds of response, while baseline UACR and HbA1c were not informative. Discrimination analyses in NP-DKD (Figure 1) demonstrated superior performance of uIL-6 (AUROC 0.88) compared with UACR (AUROC 0.55), consistent with reports that inflammatory urinary cytokines capture risk beyond albuminuria [10–12]. Longitudinally (Figure 2), uIL-6 fell at 3 and 42 months, UACR declined more gradually, and eGFR rose slightly, supporting an early anti-inflammatory/tubulointerstitial signal preceding albumin uric change [10–12]. Creatinine/specific-gravity indexing underpins assay robustness and mitigates dilution bias [18].
Conclusion: The uIL-6 complements UACR in DKD evaluation. In NP-DKD, dapagliflozin lowered uIL-6 without parallel UACR change, and uIL-6 better predicted response and preservation of kidney function. Incorporating uIL-6—particularly for NP-DKD—may refine risk stratification and enable earlier assessment of therapeutic effect alongside standard CGA staging.
Recommendations: Incorporate uIL-6 into DKD assessment to identify high-risk NP-DKD patients missed by albuminuria-only strategies.Use uIL-6 as an early pharmacodynamic marker of SGLT2 treatment effect, preceding changes in UACR or eGFR.