Report of laparoscopic findings in refractory peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/a2c38ae65ac30e2591139ac0291cfb43.pdf
Report of laparoscopic findings in refractory peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Hiroaki
Io
Hiroaki Io hiroaki@juntendo.ac.jp Juntendo University Nerima Hospital Nephrology & Blood purification center Tokyo Japan *
Toshiki Kano tkano@juntendo.ac.jp Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Department of Nephrology Tokyo Japan -
Junichiro Nakata jnakata@juntendo.ac.jp Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Department of Nephrology Tokyo Japan -
Haruna Ishi h-fukuzaki@juntendo.ac.jp Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Department of Nephrology Tokyo Japan -
Takuya Maeda ta-maeda@juntendo.ac.jp Juntendo University Nerima Hospital Nephrology & Blood purification center Tokyo Japan -
Yusuke Suzuki yusuke@juntendo.ac.jp Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Department of Nephrology Tokyo Japan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

【Background】 There are no reports of laparoscopic findings in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. We have previously reported laparoscopic imaging findings at the end of PD (KI Reports 2016, Semin Dial 2020, Nephrology 2023).

【Method】 We investigated laparoscopic findings observed during catheter removal and reinsertion for intractable peritonitis at our hospital. We present and report the findings along with their imaging findings.

【Results】 Intraperitoneal findings were variable. In cases of Mycobacterium/MRSA, strong pseudo membrane formation and adhesions were observed, and differences in localization and severity were observed. In all cases several years had passed without complications of encapsulateted peritoneal sclerosis. In the case of Corynebacterium, there was almost no evidence of inflammatory changes in the abdominal cavity, and PD was reintroduced 2 months later. In the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, there were strong signs of intraperitoneal adhesions and fibrin occlusion, which led to the removal of the PD catheter. Three years later, due to the patient's strong desire to restart PD, laparoscopic observation showed that the adhesions were improving over time and were easy to remove with forceps, so PD was reintroduced. However, due to insufficient water removal, the patient was used in PD+HD combination therapy.

【Conclusion】 Although it is difficult to infer the intraperitoneal cavity from clinical findings, we believe that the decision to re-place a PD catheter should be made carefully in cases of peritonitis that exhibit strong inflammatory changes. Laparoscopic findings at the time of PD catheter removal in patients with refractory peritonitis may be helpful in evaluating the possibility of restarting PD. 

Kewords