CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT RESPONSE IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH IGA NEPHROPATHY WITH AND WITHOUT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/b6e027cc5d4c197b904967c279e16843.pdf
CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT RESPONSE IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH IGA NEPHROPATHY WITH AND WITHOUT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Takahide
Iwasaki
Takahide Iwasaki hide1025do@gmail.com Hyogo Medical University Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine Nishinomiya Japan *
Akihiro Kuma ak-kuma@hyo-med.ac.jp Hyogo Medical University Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine Nishinomiya Japan -
Takahiro Kuragano kuragano@hyo-med.ac.jp Hyogo Medical University Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine Nishinomiya Japan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can cause renal involvement via immune mechanisms along the gut–kidney axis, with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) being the most frequent manifestation. In Japan, tonsillectomy is often combined with corticosteroids for IgAN based on mucosal immune hypotheses; however, its benefit in IBD-associated IgAN is unclear. To clarify the clinical and pathological differences, treatment responses, and renal outcomes, we compared patients with IgAN with and without IBD in a single-center Japanese cohort.

We retrospectively reviewed 127 patients diagnosed with IgAN by biopsy at our hospital between 2013 and 2021. After excluding 11 patients aged ≤18 years and those lost to follow-up, 116 patients (non-IBD-associated IgAN, 101 cases; IBD-associated IgAN, 15 cases) were analyzed. Primary endpoints evaluated were changes in proteinuria over two years after treatment, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope, proteinuria remission rate based on the Oxford classification, and cumulative proteinuria remission rate. Statistical analyses included t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables, chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, multiple linear regression analysis for determinants of eGFR slope, and Cox proportional hazards models for the cumulative proteinuria remission rate. 

No significant differences in baseline renal function or proteinuria between patients with IgAN without IBD and those with IBD-associated IgAN were observed (eGFR 74.2 ± 27.5 vs 80.0 ± 21.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p=0.44; proteinuria 0.76 [0.46–1.70] vs 0.72 [0.50–1.08] g/gCr, p=0.62). The IBD group had a higher proportion of males (93%, p<0.001) and higher serum IgA levels (587 [435–632] mg/dL, p<0.001). Treatment frequencies were comparable for RAS inhibitors (96.0% vs. 86.7%, p=0.17), corticosteroids (74.3% vs. 80.0%, p=0.76), and tonsillectomies (80.2% vs. 60.0%, p=0.10). No differences were observed in the Oxford MEST-C scores. Among patients with IBD-associated IgAN, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis accounted for 73.3% and 26.7%, respectively. At the time of renal diagnosis, 86.7% of the patients had inactive IBD. At 2 years, the reduction rate in proteinuria was similar (−77.6% [−87.1 to −57.8] vs −85.2% [−95 to −50], p=0.36), and no difference was observed in the eGFR slope (−2.54 [−5.25 to 1.36] vs −1.03 [−6.52 to −0.54] mL/min/1.73 m²/year, p=0.93). In multivariate analysis, the eGFR slope was independently associated with: baseline eGFR (β=−0.49, p<0.001), baseline proteinuria (β=−0.20, p=0.049), tonsillectomy (β=0.32, p=0.02), segmental sclerosis (S lesions; β=−0.21, p=0.048), but was not associated with IBD status (β=0.13, p=0.23). Urinary protein remission rates based on the Oxford classification did not differ between MEST-C classifications. Cox regression analysis revealed no association between IBD and cumulative urinary protein remission rates (Hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.53–2.45; p=0.7).

In this Japanese cohort, patients with IBD-associated IgAN showed clinical features, treatment responses, and renal outcomes comparable to those without IBD. These findings suggest that the coexistence of IBD does not adversely affect renal prognosis if intestinal inflammation is adequately controlled and evidence-based IgAN therapy is administered.

Kewords