ANALYSIS OF COMPETING RISKS IN DECISIONS REGARDING RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOR OLDER PATIENTS: A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY IN JAPAN

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/7dd605099381f4de68eede9a09ae6d3c.pdf
ANALYSIS OF COMPETING RISKS IN DECISIONS REGARDING RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOR OLDER PATIENTS: A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY IN JAPAN

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Keiko
Oda
Keiko Oda k-oda@med.mie-u.ac.jp Mie University School of Medicine Cardiology and Nephrology Tsu city, Mie Prefecture Japan *
Masaki Tanabe m-tanabe@med.mie-u.ac.jp Mie University School of Medicine Infection Control and Infectious Disease Crisis Management Tsu city, Mie Prefecture Japan -
Shiho Ito itoshiho@med.mie-u.ac.jp Mie University School of Medicine Infection Control and Infectious Disease Crisis Management Tsu city, Mie Prefecture Japan -
Tomohiro Murata tmhr0421@med.mie-u.ac.jp Mie University School of Medicine Cardiology and Nephrology Tsu city, Mie Prefecture Japan -
Kan Katayama katayamk@med.mie-u.ac.jp Mie University School of Medicine Cardiology and Nephrology Tsu city, Mie Prefecture Japan -
Kaoru Dohi dohik@med.mie-u.ac.jp Mie University School of Medicine Cardiology and Nephrology Tsu city, Mie Prefecture Japan -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

In Japan’s super-aged society, the growing number of very old patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses clinical challenges regarding the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). This study aimed to clarify the relationship between RRT initiation and mortality using nationwide real-world data.

We used a nationwide administrative claims and health check-up database from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The study included 2,020,203 individuals aged ≥75 years enrolled in the Late-Stage Elderly Health Care System between April 2021 and March 2023. Individuals who died during follow-up were retained, while those who lost eligibility were excluded. As of September 2021, patients receiving RRT were identified via procedure codes, and the prevalence was compared with Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT) data.

To assess one-year RRT initiation, we identified 309,265 individuals who underwent health checkups between July and September 2021 without prior RRT. Among individuals with advanced kidney dysfunction (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m²), three groups were defined: (1) RRT initiation, (2) death without RRT, and (3) survival without RRT for one year. Frailty was assessed across 15 physical, psychological, and social items, with higher scores indicating greater frailty. Baseline characteristics were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis and chi-square tests (p < 0.01). Cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) were plotted for RRT initiation, accounting for death as a competing risk. Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models estimated predictors of RRT initiation (p < 0.05).

The database showed high external validity: the overall RRT prevalence (0.74%) was consistent with national JSDT data (0.70%). However, the one-year RRT incidence (0.048%) in the health checkup cohort was lower than national data (0.088%), likely reflecting selection bias from healthier individuals who undergo checkups. A total of 148 individuals initiated RRT within one year. When stratified by baseline kidney function, the incidence was 0.0037% for eGFR > 60, 0.012% for 30–60, 0.47% for 15–30, and 18.5% for <15 mL/min/1.73 m². In those with eGFR < 15 (n = 477), baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1, and competing risks of RRT initiation and death in Figure 1. The one-year cumulative incidence of RRT initiation was 18.5%, and that of pre-RRT mortality was 16.7%. In the Fine–Gray model, older age (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 0.93) and higher eGFR (sHR = 0.84) significantly reduced the likelihood of RRT initiation, whereas male sex (sHR = 1.85) and hyperuricemia (sHR = 2.27) significantly increased it.

Table 1


The database of older adults closely reflected national dialysis data in Japan. Advanced age independently predicted non-initiation of RRT, reflecting real-world treatment selection. Mortality was a competing event of similar magnitude to RRT initiation, emphasizing that in very old patients with advanced CKD, decisions regarding RRT are best made through shared decision-making (SDM). SDM should address the high competing risk of mortality and weigh the benefits and burdens of RRT, rather than assuming it as the default pathway. These findings support conservative kidney management(CKM) as a viable and patient-centered option for older adults with advanced CKD.

Kewords