Plasma Exchange for Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody Disease with Dialysis Dependency: A Case Series on Clinical Outcomes and Safety

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
 
Plasma Exchange for Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody Disease with Dialysis Dependency: A Case Series on Clinical Outcomes and Safety

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Minoru
Sakuragi
Minoru Sakuragi mnsakura@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan * Kyoto University Department of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
Miho Miyauchi mihomiyauchi0319@gmail.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Shiga University of Medical Science Department of Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology Shiga Japan
Misaki Kubo m.taniguchi332@gmail.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Tottoti prefectural central hospital Department of Nephrology Tottori Japan
Mea Aso mea.asoh.ma@gmail.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - St. Marianna University Hospital Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Hypertension Kanagawa Japan
Sanae Ogura apinkiering@gmail.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Center for Preventive Medicine Osaka Japan
Yuko Sokai y-soushou@kitano-hp.or.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Clinical Engineering Osaka Japan -
Yoshiki Tsuji m-tsuzi@kitano-hp.or.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Clinical Engineering Osaka Japan -
Keita P. Mori moryk.kitano@gmail.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan -
Kazuo Torikoshi ktoriy@yahoo.co.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Katagiri Memorial Clinic Niigata Japan
Hiroyuki Suzuki phillies4331@nifty.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Ozawa Hospital Division of Nephrology and Dialysis Kanagawa Japan
Toshiyuki Komiya komiya@zeus.eonet.ne.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital Department of Nephrology Shiga Japan
Eri Muso emuso@kki.biglobe.ne.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan - Kyoto Kacho University Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Contemporary Home Economics Kyoto Japan
Tomomi Endo t-endou1106@kitano-hp.or.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan -
Takeshi Matsubara t-matsubara@kitano-hp.or.jp Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan -
Tatsuo Tsukamoto tsukamoto5017@gmail.com Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Osaka Japan -

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibody disease is a rare but highly aggressive autoimmune disorder targeting type IV collagen, leading to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and, occasionally, pulmonary hemorrhage. Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, renal outcomes remain poor, particularly in patients presenting with dialysis dependency. Plasma exchange (PEx) combined with immunosuppression is recommended as a key component of first-line therapy by major guidelines, including KDIGO 2021 and ASFA 2023. However, its efficacy and safety in patients already requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) remain uncertain, as most recommendations rely on limited observational data rather than real-world evidence. Recent studies suggest that the proportion of preserved normal glomeruli may influence renal recovery even in dialysis-dependent cases. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and safety of PEx in biopsy-confirmed anti-GBM disease requiring RRT and explored histopathological and clinical factors associated with renal recovery and treatment-related complications.

We retrospectively reviewed nine biopsy-confirmed anti-GBM patients who required RRT at presentation. All received PEx in combination with standard immunosuppression. PEx was performed two to three times per week, exchanging approximately 1.0–1.2 estimated plasma volumes, using 5% albumin in most cases or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) when immunoglobulin depletion or bleeding risk warranted. Anticoagulation was achieved with heparin or nafamostat, and PEx and hemodialysis were performed sequentially. Clinical, serological, and pathological data were comprehensively evaluated for renal outcomes, including dialysis dependency and renal recovery, and PEx-related adverse events.

Among nine patients, two (22.2%) discontinued RRT at 10 and 11 months and remained dialysis-free for ≥90 days. Both had relatively preserved normal glomeruli (37.2% and 15.8%), minimal interstitial fibrosis, and achieved early serological remission at four and three months. The remaining seven stayed dialysis-dependent, typically with few preserved glomeruli. Overall, anti-GBM antibodies became seronegative within 12 months in five of nine cases (55.6%). Of the nine patients, eight experienced no severe PEx-related adverse events. One patient developed retroperitoneal hemorrhage approximately two weeks after renal biopsy, likely associated with fibrinogen depletion during intensive PEx. Other events were limited to mild allergic reactions, and no catheter-related issues, circuit failures, or life-threatening complications were observed.

PEx may promote renal recovery in selected patients with anti-GBM disease requiring RRT, particularly those with preserved normal glomeruli. Pathological assessment should guide the intensity and duration of PEx therapy, while close monitoring of coagulation parameters and timely FFP supplementation are essential to minimize bleeding risk. The transient antibody rebound observed in one case underscores the limitation of relying solely on serological remission and highlights the need for flexible therapeutic adjustments. These findings emphasize the heterogeneity of this high-risk population requiring RRT and the importance of individualized treatment strategies that balance efficacy and safety.

Kewords