NALFURAFINE FOR REFRACTORY UREMIC AND CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

 

Certificate Output Instructions

For best output, select "Paper Size" as "A4" and "Margin" as "0" or "None".

To save or print to PDF, please select Print Destination > Save as PDF, enable Background Graphics under "More Settings", then click "Save".

 


 

Certificate Background

   

Presented the abstract " "
(Abstract co-author(s):  )

 

 

E-Poster Presentation

During the congress, E-Posters will be accessible to all participants on the congress website 24/7, as well as in the E-poster stations in the congress center. 

Preparing your E-Poster

Please review the E-Poster format requirements carefully when preparing your E-Poster. Should your E-Poster not meet the mentioned requirements, it may not be displayed as described above.

​E-Poster Submission Deadline

Please prepare and upload your E-Poster no later than March 14, 2026 11.59PM CET. After this date, you will no longer be able to prepare and upload your E-poster and it will not be displayed and accessible on the congress website.​

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/eb153c92aed7256b8543a6d4c74d6e99.pdf
NALFURAFINE FOR REFRACTORY UREMIC AND CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN A HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Keqing
Zhu
Keqing Zhu kathy_qing@163.com the 903 RD Hospital of PLA Department of Nephrology Hangzhou China *
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the κ-opioid receptor agonist nalfurafine for treating refractory pruritus with dual uremic and cholestatic origins in a post-liver transplant hemodialysis patient.

We present a 60-year-old female with decompensated cirrhosis post-liver transplantation, hepatorenal syndrome progressing to CKD Stage 5 on maintenance hemodialysis, who developed refractory pruritus. Clinical data, laboratory parameters, treatment response, and outcomes were analyzed. A literature review on uremic pruritus (UP), cholestatic pruritus (CP), and nalfurafine was conducted.

The upper image shows the patient's condition before treatment, with excoriations and skin breakdown on the scalp, as well as erythema and scratch marks on the skin of both lower limbs. The lower image demonstrates the patient's condition after one week of treatment, showing healed scalp lesions with detached scabs, absence of new excoriations, and resolution of erythema and scratch marks on both lower limbs.The patient, a 60-year-old female with a history of liver transplantation for decompensated cirrhosis, developed hepatorenal syndrome and initiated maintenance hemodialysis for CKD Stage 5 on February 17, 2025. During her course, she experienced recurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (pathogen: vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium) necessitating multiple courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics (including cefoperazone-sulbactam, meropenem, daptomycin, linezolid). On April 17, she developed severe generalized pruritus accompanied by urticaria on the trunk and limbs. Initially suspected as a drug allergy, all potential culprit medications were discontinued, and prednisone was administered. While the urticarial rash resolved and the infection was controlled, intense pruritus affecting the head, arms, back, palms, and soles persisted, notably worsening at night, severely impairing sleep and quality of life. Based on her history and laboratory findings on April 19 (ALP 492 U/L, γ-GTP 412 U/L, BUN 18.9 mmol/L, SCr 482 μmol/L), a diagnosis of "Uremic Pruritus complicated by Cholestatic Pruritus" was established. Despite trials of various standard therapies including antihistamines, intensified hemodialysis with hemoperfusion, gabapentin, ursodeoxycholic acid, sertraline, topical tacrolimus ointment, and achieving targets for phosphate and parathyroid hormone control, the generalized pruritus remained refractory. After thorough evaluation and exclusion of contraindications, nalfurafine (2.5 μg orally once nightly) was initiated. Following treatment, the patient's pruritus significantly improved within 5 days, with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score decreasing from 7 to 2. Sleep quality markedly improved. No significant adverse effects, such as nausea, dizziness, somnolence, or further elevation in AST, ALT, ALP, or γ-GTP levels, were observed during treatment.

A review of the literature indicates that pruritus is a common and distressing comorbidity in both uremia and chronic liver disease, with complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. UP is associated with μ-opioid receptor pathway overexpression, immune dysregulation, microinflammation, and xerosis. CP is primarily linked to bile acid accumulation, endogenous opioid system imbalance, and mediators like lysophosphatidic acid (LPA). Nalfurafine, a highly selective κ-opioid receptor agonist, is believed to exert its antipruritic effect by activating central κ-receptors, thereby counteracting μ-receptor-mediated pruritogenic signaling, and may also modulate bile acid-related itch pathways. Multiple randomized controlled trials have established the efficacy of nalfurafine in ameliorating UP in hemodialysis patients. In this complex case, characterized by dual UP and CP pathophysiology, multiple infections, polypharmacy, and drug hypersensitivity, nalfurafine demonstrated notable efficacy and excellent tolerability. This outcome underscores its mechanistic advantage and potential therapeutic value in challenging clinical scenarios involving mixed-origin pruritus.

In conclusion, nalfurafine presents a promising therapeutic option for refractory pruritus of mixed uremic and cholestatic origin, effectively addressing the complex dual pathophysiology through its central κ-opioid receptor agonist mechanism. Its efficacy and safety profile, as demonstrated in this complex case, warrant further validation in large-scale clinical trials to establish its role in managing this challenging condition in the dialysis population, particularly among those with concomitant liver dysfunction.

Kewords