DM forms part of a
group of diseases classified as Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) and
includes polymyositis (PM). DM is characterized by the presence of characteristic
cutaneous lesions (heliotrope rash, gottrons papules, periungal telangiectasia,
shawl sign and V-sign) with or without proximal muscle weakness. DM is paraneoplastic in up to 25% of cases.2
The risk of malignancy is similar in myopathic and amyopathic cases.3
There is no association between myositis related antibodies and paraneoplastic
DM but there is an association between anti- transcriptional intermediary
factor 1 gamma (TIF-1ɤ) , anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2) and anti- small
ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibodies. 2,3
The most associated
malignancies are solid organ tumours, most frequently, breast, lung, ovarian
and urothelial cancers. 2,3 Haematological malignancies are less
common with only a handful of case reports in the literature. The more commonly associated haematological
malignancies are lymphomas.4 From a large retrospective cohort
involving 4641 patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of
unknown significance (MGUS), there was a 2.29 times relative risk of developing
plasma cell dyscrasia in patients who presented with IIM.5
Cases of DM associated
with multiple myeloma are rare with only a few documented case reports. The
timeline of these cases is also var,iable with the diagnosis of MM either preceding or following the diagnosis
of DM. 6,7,8makes up 1.8% of all malignancies; the median age at
diagnosis is approximately 65 years and it is almost two times more common in
the black population.5
This case is the first
case in literature documenting paraneoplastic DM as the form of presentation of
SMM and it allowed for early detection and treatment to prevent organ damage.
Inflammatory myopathies are associated with malignancies,
but DM is significantly more than PM. In a cohort study the prevalence of
malignancies was 32 % in patients with DM and 15% in patients with PM. 6
Chronic immune
stimulation is considered the underlying mechanism which leads to T-cell and
B-cell activation leading to the development of hematological malignancies like
MM.5 Crossover immunity between myofibroblasts and tumour cells may
reflect the simultaneous presentation of the two diseases.6
In this case the
presentation of DM occurred concurrently at the time of diagnosis of smoldering
MM. What makes this case interesting is the lack of biochemical or radiology
features to suggest plasma cell dyscrasia, and had it not been because of the
presentation with DM, the diagnosis of SMM may have been missed. It also
emphasizes that although haematological malignancies are less commonly
associated with paraneoplastic DM, it should form part of routine screening
together with other investigations.
The revised
international working group diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma
facilitates the early diagnosis of plasma cell disorders to allow for early
treatment to avoid progression to end organ damage. 9 This case
serves as a clear example of its utility in early diagnosis.
This patient was
referred to a haem-oncologist and received 6 cycles of bortezomib/leflunamide
and dexamethasone. His most recent blood results are shown in table 1.
A key point is that the
reason for the referral was proteinuria, and this serves as a reminder of the
core principles of history taking and clinical examination. This prompted
further investigation into the type of protein in the urine. This case was
referred to a nephrologist and highlights how urine analysis can be the
harbinger of diagnosis of a systemic illness and must be done routinely in the
form of a simple bedside urine dipstick test and not underestimated
References:
1.
Gomes RR. A Case of
Dermatomyositis Presenting with Fulminant Rhabdomyolysis without Myoglobinuric
Acute Kidney Injury—A Rare Clinical Manifestation. Arch Rheum Arthritis Res. 2020;1(3):ARAR.MS.ID.000512.
doi:10.33552/ARAR.2020.01.000512.
2.
Requena C, Alfaro A, Traves V, Nagore E, Sanmartín
O, Guillén C, et al. Paraneoplastic Dermatomyositis: A Study of 12 Cases. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(7):675-682.
doi:10.1016/j.ad.2013.11.007.
3.
Requena C, Sánchez-Romero E, Nagore E, Sanmartín
O. Paraneoplastic Dermatomyositis: A 25-Patient Series from a
Cancer Center. J Invest Dermatol. 2025;116(4):T444-T448.
4.
Marie I, Guillevin L, Ménard JF, Cherin P,
Hachulla E, Mouthon L, et al. Hematological Malignancy Associated
with Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11(9):615-620.
doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2011.10.024.
5.
Shimanovsky A, Alvarez Argote J, Murali S, Dasanu
CA. Autoimmune Manifestations in Patients with Multiple
Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. BBA Clin. 2016;6:12-18.
doi:10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.05.004.
6.
Islam MS, Kotoucek P. Multiple
Myeloma Associated with Dermatomyositis: A Short Report and Mini-Review. Int J Blood Res Disord. 2018;5:029.
doi:10.23937/2469-5696/1410029.
7.
Muñoz J, Hanbali A. A Young
Patient with Multiple Myeloma. Blood. 2012;119(13):2979.
doi:10.1182/blood-2011-06-362905.
8.
Faria D, Silva J, Neves J, Rodrigues J, Afonso C,
Peixoto D. Systemic Sclerosis and Myositis as a Paraneoplastic
Syndrome Secondary to Multiple Myeloma. Acta Reumatol Port. 2018;43(2):316-317.
9.
Rajkumar SV. Multiple Myeloma:
2024 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(9):1802-1824.
doi:10.1002/ajh.27422.