LOIN PAIN IN RARE KIDNEY DISEASE: ANALYSIS OF 3867 QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES WITH LINKED DATA FROM THE UK NATIONAL REGISTRY OF RARE KIDNEY DISEASES (RaDaR) 3817

Submitted
Yes
Abstract Submission
Abstract Details
LOIN PAIN IN RARE KIDNEY DISEASE: ANALYSIS OF 3867 QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES WITH LINKED DATA FROM THE UK NATIONAL REGISTRY OF RARE KIDNEY DISEASES (RaDaR)

Please follow the instructions below to input your abstract title.

Abstract titles should be brief and reflect the content of the abstract.

  • The title will not be accepted if it exceeds 25 words.
  • Type in CAPITAL LETTERS.
  • Lowercase may be used for abbreviations only, for example, mRNA.
Presenting Author
Please enter the email address before you enter the other details.
Yes
891801
katie.wong@ukkidney.org
Katie
Wong
UK Kidney Association
RaDaR
Bristol
United Kingdom
Co-Authors
7
Kristina Newman kln12@leicester.ac.uk University of Leicester The Mayer IgA Nephropathy Laboratories Leicester United Kingdom
Haresh Selvaskandan hs328@leicester.ac.uk University of Leicester The Mayer IgA Nephropathy Laboratories Leicester United Kingdom
Jonathan Barratt jb81@leicester.ac.uk University of Leicester The Mayer IgA Nephropathy Laboratories Leicester United Kingdom
Zoe Plummer zoe.plummer@ukkidney.org UK Kidney Association RaDaR Bristol United Kingdom
Susan Pywell susan.pywell@ukkidney.org UK Kidney Association RaDaR Bristol United Kingdom
Sherry Masoud sherry.masoud@ukkidney.org UK Kidney Association RaDaR Bristol United Kingdom
Daniel P. Gale d.gale@ucl.ac.uk University College London Department of Renal Medicine London United Kingdom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Theme & Topic
Better Kidney Health
Epidemiology, Outcomes and Health Service Research Related to CKD or Its Complications
AS16
ISN Programs

Abstracts arising from participation in ISN Programs may be eligible to compete for certain ISN Program Awards. Please indicate if you have taken part in any of the official ISN Programs mentioned hereafter, and your abstract is associated with your participation:

  • ISN Fellowship Program
  • ISN Sister Renal Centers Program/ISN-TTS Sister Transplant Centers Program
  • ISN Mentorship Program
  • ISN Clinical Research Program
No
 
Young Nephrologists Best Clinical Abstract
The ISN offers presenting authors under 40 the opportunity to apply for two Young Nephrologists Awards. These awards will cover travel and accommodation costs for attending the congress. Each winner will have an 8-minute oral abstract presentation during a session at the congress.
Yes, the presenting author is <40 years old and would like to be considered for the following award:
Abstract Content

State the purpose of the study, describe the method, summarize the results presenting sufficient details to support the conclusions, and give the conclusions reached (it is not acceptable to state 'The results will be discussed'). Use numerals for numbers and only very well-known abbreviations e.g., ml, Osm, GFR. If you must use other abbreviations, please explain them the first time they appear. Limit the use of symbols (i.e., use M or F to indicate Male and Female instead of the symbol font). Do not identify yourself or your institution in the text.

You may use up to 3,400 characters. Spaces are included in the character count (tables and graphs do not count as characters if inserted as an image). Abstract authors/co-authors’ names and affiliations, and keywords do not count towards the 3,400-character allowance.

Images must be in JPEG or PNG format (uploaded images cannot exceed 640w x 480h pixels and 1.5 MB).

The abstract should be following this structure: Introduction, Methods, Results and Conclusions.

Chronic pain is a common symptom for patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and reduces health-related quality of life. Loin pain is a predominant feature in certain rare kidney diseases such as Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Little is known about loin pain in other rare kidney diseases, including whether loin pain is associated with reduced kidney function, or disease progression. In this questionnaire study we describe the severity and frequency of loin pain in RaDaR participants, and examine associations between loin pain and CKD progression and age at kidney failure.

RaDaR participants were invited by email to complete an online questionnaire between 5/3/24-3/6/24. Responses were collated on the JISC online platform. Participants were asked to indicate whether and when they experienced loin pain, analgesic usage, and complete the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Responses were linked to RaDaR demographic data, validated data from the UK Renal Registry on Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) initiation, and renal unit laboratory data.  Responses were examined individually and by disease type (non-inflammatory, glomerular, cystic, metabolic, tubular, other disorders and Alport syndrome). Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with and without loin pain. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between loin pain and age, Sex, Ethnicity, Body Mass Index (BMI), Index of Multiple Deprivation Quintile (IMD, an area level measure of deprivation), disease type (baseline=non-inflammatory disorders), and CKD stage/KRT status. Linear regression was used to fit a straight line through each patient’s mean eGFR values for each 3 month period of follow up post diagnosis to determine annualised eGFR slopes for patients with and without loin pain.  

3867/16431 patients from 31 rare disease groups completed the questionnaire (24% response rate). Loin pain was reported by 62% of respondents, 23% historically and 39% recently (Table1). Respondents who were female (aOR 1.62, 95% CI [1.38-1.90], p<0.001), had a higher BMI (BMI >40, aOR 2.2, [1.39-3.72], p<0.0001), were from more socially deprived areas (IMD Quintile 1-most deprived, aOR 1.75 [1.29-2.37], p<0.001), and had metabolic or cystic kidney disease (aOR 6.1 [2.10-17.7], p<0.001 and aOR 1.72 [1.37-2.15], p<0.001, respectively) had higher odds of loin pain. Ethnicity and CKD stage/KRT status were not associated with increased odds of loin pain (aOR 0.92 [0.80-1.05] p=0.25 and aOR 1.02 [0.98-1.06], p=0.39 respectively). Pain was most frequently reported as aching (79%). Median pain rating index derived from the SF-MPQ-2 was 29, IQR [11-62] for all respondents, and varied by disease type (non-inflammatory disorders median 4, IQR [0-32], metabolic disease 30.5, [9.5-77.5]). 41% of respondents experiencing loin pain used analgesia at least weekly. 4% used strong opioids. Mean annualised eGFR slope over total follow up was -2.8 ml/min/1.73m2/yr (SD 9.0) for participants with loin pain, and -1.9 ml/min/1.73m2/yr (SD 8.4) for those without (p=0.03).

Loin pain is common in rare kidney diseases: > 60% of participants had experienced loin pain. Loin pain was not associated with CKD stage/KRT status, suggesting it may be related to disease aetiology rather than simply reduced kidney function, but was associated with faster eGFR decline.

Keywords
The abstract author must input at least 1 and a maximum of 5 keywords. Type your keyword in the box below:
Rare diseases
Epidemiology
Chronic Pain
 
 
Transparency Declaration Ethics Statement
Organ trafficking and tourism ethics compliance: Scientific studies and clinical activities must be performed in keeping with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism. By submitting an abstract, you state that you have not violated any aspect of the Declaration or associated consensus statements on live donation and research on human subjects.
Yes
Declaration
I have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.
Please declare any potential conflict of interest and support of funding related to this abstract.
 
Potential conflicts of interest can involve grants, honoraria, shares, paid positions on advisory boards, etc. Please fill in your disclosure statement in the field(s) below.
I did not use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.
The below guidance only refers to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process.

Where authors use generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process, authors should only use these technologies to improve readability and language. Applying the technology should be done with human oversight and control, and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased. AI and AI-assisted technologies should not be listed as an author or co-author, or be cited as an author. Authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans, as outlined in KIR publisher’s (Elsevier) AI policy for authors.

Authors should disclose in their abstract the use of AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process by following the instructions below. A statement will appear in the published work. Please note that authors are ultimately responsible and accountable for the contents of the work.

Disclosure instructions: Authors must disclose the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process by adding a statement at the end of their abstract, in a new section entitled ‘Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process’.

This declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools for checking grammar, spelling, references etc. If there is nothing to disclose, there is no need to add a statement.

 
Please use this wording for your declaration and update it as per the AI tools/services used:

Statement: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.
No
I have declared this at the end of the abstract (as last sentence in section Conclusions), clearly stating the name of the original meeting(s). I also declare that re-submitting the abstract is permitted by the organizers of the original meeting(s).
Notes

The deadline abstract presenters must register by is November 6, 2024, to have their abstract published in Kidney International Reports® and presented at WCN.

A cancellation of registration after the registration deadline will result in no publication and presentation of the abstract unless the abstract presenter is replaced by a fully registered delegate. Please note that in case you receive a grant or sponsorship support after registering and wish to cancel/refund, the WCN cancellation policy will apply.

In the event the presenting author cannot attend, and they wish to change to a new presenting author, the original presenting author must communicate this information to the Abstract team (abstractswcn@theisn.org) to confirm that the new presenting author is registered. Failure to do so will result in the withdrawal of the abstract.

Abstract presenters must register using the same email, if they fail to do so and do not communicate the change of email to the Abstract team, the abstract might not be published in Kidney International Reports® or presented onsite. WCN organizers will not be held responsible for non-publication.

Yes