CKD PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLEMENT 3 GLOMERULOPATHY (C3G) IN A US MULTI-CENTER ASSESSMENT

https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/2942635baf4ae3fb35c45333a9bb5c63.pdf
CKD PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLEMENT 3 GLOMERULOPATHY (C3G) IN A US MULTI-CENTER ASSESSMENT
Briana
Ndife
Carolina Aldworth carolina.aldworth@novartis.com Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Medical Affairs East Hanover
Kathleen P. Murphy kathleen_p.murphy@novartis.com Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Medical Affairs East Hanover
Jennifer Nguyen jennifer-1.nguyen@novartis.com Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Medical Affairs East Hanover
Irina Pivneva Irina.Pivneva@analysisgroup.com Analysis Group Health Economics and Outcomes Research Massachusetts
Marie Louise Edwards marielouise.edwards@analysisgroup.com Analysis Group Health Economics and Outcomes Research Massachusetts
Annika Anderson Annika.Anderson@analysisgroup.com Analysis Group Health Economics and Outcomes Research Massachusetts
James Signorovitch James.Signorovitch@analysisgroup.com Analysis Group Health Economics and Outcomes Research Massachusetts
Pietro Canetta pac2004@cumc.columbia.edu Columbia University Irving Medical Center Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine New York
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Patients with C3G have high rates of progression despite treatment. Using electronic medical record data, this study characterized disease progression in a US cohort of patients with C3G. 

This was a retrospective cohort study of de-identified patients within the US Optum Life Science clinical electronic health record database, aged ≥12 years at C3G diagnosis (per ICD-10 or SNOMED) between Jan 2015–Jun 2022. Index date was the date of diagnosis. Patients had continuous clinical activity ≥12 months before (baseline) and ≥6 months after (follow-up) index. Patients were followed until death or data end. 

Patient and clinical characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics, and time to CKD progression using Kaplan–Meier analyses. 

Of 284 patients in the final sample, mean age ± SD was 49 years ± 21; 136/228 (60%) had stage ≥3 CKD at index. During follow-up, 115/188 patients (61%) progressed to a higher CKD stage than at index, and/or to kidney failure; median time to progression was 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.4, 17.7). At 6 and 12 months, 38% and 48% of patients, respectively, had a progression of CKD stage. In progressors (n=115), mean age was 54 years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 2.8; in non-progressors (n=73), mean age was 48 years and mean CCI score was 1.8. Among progressors and non-progressors, 14% and 6% of patients, respectively, were African American, had hypertension (79% and 55%), and had prior kidney transplant (10% and 3%) at baseline. At index, 68/115 (59%) of progressors and 28/73 (38%) of non-progressors had CKD stage ≥3. Within 90 days of index, a higher proportion of progressors relative to non-progressors were treated with ACE inhibitors (31% and 22%) or ARBs (23% and 14%). Up to 90 days after index, mean ± SD protein:creatinine ratio was 2.3 ± 2.6 g/g in 21 assessed non-progressors and 3.7 ± 5.0 g/g in 53 assessed progressors. The proportion of patients with complement C3 level <77 mg/dL at baseline was 15/47 (32%) among progressors and 9/24 (38%) among non-progressors. 

Patients with C3G progress rapidly despite supportive care. Noted differences between progressors and non-progressors warrant further investigation.  

This abstract was also submitted for the ASN’23 congress. By submitting the abstract to WCN’24, abstract authors declare that re-submitting the abstract is permitted by the organizers of the previous meeting. 

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos