Sex differnces in relative cancer survival in people with and without kidney failure; an Australian and New Zealand population-based cohort study, 1980-2019

https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/df19ed4e1dd69255d5dd0937ff812183.pdf
Sex differnces in relative cancer survival in people with and without kidney failure; an Australian and New Zealand population-based cohort study, 1980-2019
Brenda Maria
Rosales
Laia Oliveras Pages loliveras@bellvitgehospital.cat Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Nephrology Department Barcelona
Brenda Maria Rosales brenda.rosales@sydney.edu.au The University of Sydney Sydney School of Public Health Sydney
Nicole De La Mata nicole.delamata@sydney.edu.au The University of Sydney Sydney School of Public Health Sydney
Claire M Vajdic cvajdic@kirby.unsw.edu.au University of New South Wales Kirby Institute Sydney
Nuria Montero n.montero@bellvitgehospital.cat Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Nephrology Department Barcelona
Josep M Cruzado jmcruzado@bellvitgehospital.cat Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Nephrology Department Barcelona
Angela C Webster angela.webster@sydney.edu.au The University of Sydney Sydney School of Public Health Sydney
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The kidney failure population is at increased risk of cancer and associated mortality. However, the drivers of excess mortality are poorly understood. Relative survival can provide insight into the excess mortality, directly or indirectly, attributed to cancer in the kidney failure population.

We estimated relative survival for people receiving dialysis (n=4089) and kidney transplant recipients (n=3253) with de novo cancer, and for the general population with cancer in Australia and New Zealand (1980-2019). The entire general population was the reference group for background mortality, adjusted for sex, age, calendar year and country. We used Poisson regression to quantify excess mortality ratios.

 

Five-year relative cancer survival was markedly lower in people receiving dialysis (0.25, 95%CI:0.23-0.26) and kidney transplant recipients (0.55, 95%CI:0.53-0.57) than in the general population with cancer.


The relative survival since cancer diagnosis plateaued for the general population with cancer; 5-year relative survival 0.67 (95%CI:0.67-0.67) and 10-year relative survival 0.65 (95%CI:0.65-0.65). However, relative survival continued to gradually decline in kidney transplant recipients (5-year relative survival 0.55 [95%CI:0.53-0.57] and 10-year relative survival 0.43 [95%CI:0.41-0.45]) and steeply declined for people receiving dialysis (5-year relative survival 0.25 [95%CI:0.23-0.26] and 10-year relative survival 0.09 [95%CI:0.08-0.10]).


Excess mortality was more than double (2.16, 95%CI:2.08-2.25) that of the general population with cancer for people on dialysis and, 34% (95%CI:1.27-2.41) higher for kidney transplant recipients.


Overall females had greater relative survival than males but experienced a higher excess mortality rate when compared to the general population with cancer. Females on dialysis had a 2.35 higher excess mortality (adjusted mortality rate 2.35, 95% CI 2.21 to 2.50) vs 2.05 in males (95% CI 1.95 to 2.15). In the transplant population, females had a 41% higher excess mortality (adjusted mortality rate 1.41, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.54) vs 26% in males (1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.36). In the general population with cancer, relative survival has improved in the past 30 years, however, this improvement has not been mirrored in females with cancer and kidney failure (Figure 1). Comparatively, relative survival has marginally improved for males with cancer and kidney failure, in particular for male kidney transplant recipeints.

Decreased cancer survival in kidney failure may reflect differences between sexes in multi-morbidity burden, reduced access to treatment, or greater harm from or reduced efficacy of treatments. Our findings support research aimed at investigating these hypotheses.

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos