ASSESSMENT OF RENAL FUNCTION BY DIFFERENT GFR ESTIMATION METHODS IN A RURAL POPULATION OF BANGLADESH

 
ASSESSMENT OF RENAL FUNCTION BY DIFFERENT GFR ESTIMATION METHODS IN A RURAL POPULATION OF BANGLADESH
MAA
Chowdhury
MM Iqbal masud_1232001@yahoo.com NIKDU & KDRG Nephrology Dhaka
Md Nasir Uddin kdrgbd@yahoo.com NIKDU Nephrology Dhaka
KS Alam kshahnoor@yahoo.com NIKDU Nephrology Dhaka
SK B anerjee drsajalk2003@yahoo.com BSMMU Cardiology Dhaka
Sohel Reza Choudhury sohel_r_choudhury@hotmail.com NHFH&RI Epidemiology And Research Dhaka
Dipal K Adhikary dka_1965@yahoo.com BSMMU Cardiology Dhaka
Rana M Hossain rm_hossain@yahoo.com BSMMU Nephrology Dhaka
Md Zahid Hassan mzhassan@buhs.ac.bd BUHS Physiology and Molecular Biology Dhaka
MS Hassan mshassan1950@yahoo.com BIRDEM Immunology Dhaka
MN Islam nazrul.rita@gmail.com DMCH Nephrology Dhaka
Sarwar Iqbal sarwariqbal2003@yahoo.com KDRG Nephrology Dhaka
MI Arslan iqbalarslan@yahoo.com KDRG Biochemistry Dhaka
 
 
 

Proper measurement of renal function is important for diagnosis and stratification of kidney disease. Though several methods have been used to estimate the glomerular filtration rate, results have been variable depending on the population studied. This study was undertaken to estimate and compare different creatinine and cystatin C based GFRs to see their agreement with each other.

This cross-sectional study was conducted on random 222 participants of a rural area. Detail medical history was taken along with available relevant investigations from each patient. The eGFR was estimated using creatinine-based C-G (Cockcroft-Gault), MDRD, CKD-EPI methods and creatinine and cystatin C based formula methods.

Mean age of the study population was 41±12 years with a majority in 31-50 years of age (59%) where male were 53%. Hypertensive subjects were 11% and diabetes was present in 7%. Mean eGFR measured by creatinine based MDRD, C&G (Cockcroft-Gault) and CKD-EPI were 117±25, 102±30 and 119±20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p=NS). Mean eGFR measured by cystatin C based equation was 107±16 and by both creatinine and cystatin C was 105±20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p=NS). Comparisons of eGFR by Bland-Altman plot in the study subjects showed some bias between all methods. Here data were skewed and a wide range for the limit of agreement.

 The distribution of the frequency of CKD stages varied significantly when each of the formulas applied by creatinine and cystatin C based methods. The stage distribution pattern by MDRD formula of G1, G2 and G3 was 86.5%, 12.6% & 0.9% ; by C-G 68.0%, 22.1% & 9.9% and by CKD-EPI 88.7%, 10.4% & 0.9%. The pattern for cystatin C based formula found only stage G1 and G2 of 87.8% &12.2% . By applying both creatinine and cystatin C it was 76.6% & 23.4%. 

GFR estimation methods revealed wide variations when the distribution pattern of CKD stages was done by different creatinine and cystatin C based formulas. Therefore, these GFR estimation methods need to be compared with an ideal measured method to identify the appropriate one.

 

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos