RENAL ALLOGRAFT OUTCOMES AMONG LIVING AND DECEASED DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS – A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM A HOSPITAL IN SOUTHERN INDIA

https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/0a7b7e73809de43329a9a052600b8148.pdf
RENAL ALLOGRAFT OUTCOMES AMONG LIVING AND DECEASED DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS – A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM A HOSPITAL IN SOUTHERN INDIA
Sreejith
Parameswaran
Karthikeyan Manoharan drkarthikmanoharan@gmail.com AIIMS, Bhubaneswar Nephrology Bhubaneswar
Saravanan AK aksaravanan982@gmail.com JIPMER, Puducherry Nephrology Puducherry
Sreerag KS sreeragks@gmail.com JIPMER, Puducherry Urology Puducherry
Harichandrakumar KT hckumar2001@gmail.com JIPMER, Puducherry Biostatistics Puducherry
Priyamvada PS priyamvadaps@gmail.com JIPMER, Puducherry Nephrology Puducherry
Kalra S siddharthkalra@gmail.com JIPMER Urology Puducherry
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Kidney transplantation (KT) offers better survival over dialysis in patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Reports of allograft outcomes after KT from India is limited.  We studied the allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation at our hospital. 

All patients who underwent KT at our hospital during the years 2012-2022 were included.  The demographic data, transplant operation details, details of graft loss and death were recorded from the KT case file and hospital discharge summaries.  Graft survival was calculated from the date of transplant to the date of initiation of dialysis.   Patient survival was calculated from the date of transplant to the date of death of the KT Recipient (KTR). Continuous variables were summarized by mean with standard deviation, and median with interquartile range.  Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to estimate the survival.  All analyses were performed with SPSS version 22. 

During the study period, 266 ESKD patients (172 from living donors, 94 from deceased donors) underwent KT at our hospital.  The 1-year and 5-years graft survival were 86 and 63 percent respectively.  When death was censored, the 1-year and 5-years graft survival were 93 and 77 percent respectively.  The 1-year and 5-years patient survival were 90 and 73 percent respectively.  Ninety-nine grafts were lost during the study period and 36 among them were lost within the first post-transplant year.  Death with a functioning graft (51.5%) and chronic antibody mediated rejection (15.1%) were the main reasons for graft failure.  Infections (90%) were the leading cause of death in patients dying with a functional graft.  There was no difference in graft survival with respect to the type of donor (living vs deceased), HLA match (any match vs no match) and induction (any induction vs no induction).

Etiology of death with a functional graftFrequency(%), n=51
Infection46(90)
Status epilepticus1(2)
Vascular access bleeding1(2)
Graft vascular complication1(2)
Myocardial infarction1(2)
Cerebrovascular accident1(2)



Premature deaths caused by infections was the principal factor limiting graft survival at our centre. Strategies to reduce infectious complications may improve graft survival.

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos