EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT REGIMENS ON KIDNEY GRAFT FUNCTION AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH A DIAGNOSIS OF ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION

https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/2adc226143b0bb6fad87c3f22dc62455.pdf
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT REGIMENS ON KIDNEY GRAFT FUNCTION AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH A DIAGNOSIS OF ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION
Hugo Leonardo
Reynoso de la Torre
Jorge Andrade Sierra jorg_andrade@hotmail.com Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Center Guadalajara, Jalisco
Ana Cristina Hernández Pugh cristy.hdz.pugh@gmail.com Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Center Guadalajara, Jalisco
José Ignacio Cerrillos Gutierrez gugo_leonardo@hotmail.com Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Center Guadalajara, Jalisco
Enrique Rojas Campos erojascampos@yahoo.com.mx Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Medical Research Unit in Kidney Diseases, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Center Guadalajara, Jalisco
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The optimal treatment for Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) remains uncertain, and its presence causes up to 60% of kidney grafts loss.

A retrospective cohort from May-2016 to June 2022, that included 176 patients ≥18 years old, hospitalized with graft dysfunction and histopathological diagnosis of AMR to receive treatment, were categorized into 3 groups; 1. Plasmapheresis (PF) + Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), 2. IVIG + Rituximab (RTX) 3. Steroids and immunosuppression treatment optimization.

On average, 63% of patients were men, and a majority were transplanted with a living donor kidney (89%), showing a median of age 32 ± 9; baseline serum creatinine (CrS) was 1.15 and during the rejection, 2.75 mg/dL; timing of biopsy 6 ± 5 years; C4d positive (68%) comparing groups of treatments there were no significant difference by CrS at the end of the follow up, episodes of infections was 27%, 20% and 10% (P=0.61), mortality was 6.8%, 2.5% and 5.8% each group (P=0.47).

There is no significant difference in graft function and mortality between treatment groups but in a logistic regression analysis predictive variable of poor graft prognosis were; CrS greater than 2.5 mg/dl at the beginning of treatment, using steroids and immunosuppression optimization treatment, greater chronicity and being younger at the time of diagnosis.

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos