So far, there are no clinical studies that prove the evidence of treatment for calciphylaxis. Because it is a rare condition, current management is based on expert experience.
The STS is often used despite uncertain effects. It is believed that its benefits result from antioxidant, vasodilator and calcium chelating mechanisms, leading to the reduction of cutaneous nodules, calcification and healing6,7.
In literature, there are several records with different times of treatment with STS, without a well-defined protocol regarding this duration. Tangkijngamvong N et al. 8 described a series of 8 cases with calciphylaxis, whose patients underwent hemodialysis and presented ulcer and necrosis classified as moderate to severe and were divided into two groups: non-responders who underwent a 20-week treatment with a 25-week survival % after one year, and responders who underwent an average of 30 weeks of treatment with 100% survival after one year. Salmhofer H et al9, described a series of 5 cases, in which the treatment was performed in combination with STS, cinacalcet, and sevelamer. The time of treatment with STS was one year and one month, without major side effects and with a survival rate of 80-100% after 1 year of treatment.
A systematic review carried out in 201710 analyzed 45 articles and 96% of patients were on dialysis with a median duration of 44.5 months and 75% were female. The impact of STS on effective treatment, non-responsive treatment and mortality was evaluated. Effective treatment was defined as patients who had stable lesions without remission, which occurred in 70.1% of patients. Treatment non-responsive was defined as stable skin lesions without remission or exacerbation of disease in patients who remained alive. All-cause mortality after STS treatment was defined as death due to exacerbation of calciphylaxis or other complications of advanced CKD, with a rate of 37.6%. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the different methods of STS administration (p = 0.19); however, the mean treatment time is not described.
In the present case, the patient had well-established risk factors for the development of calciphylaxis, such as female gender, prolonged time on hemodialysis, obesity mineral and bone disorders sHPTS. In addition, she developed very serious life-threatening manifestations, which led to the choice of prolonged use of the STS. In this case, administration of sodium thiosulphate was not associated with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, or metabolic acidosis. The patient is being followed up at the outpatient clinic, has been on treatment with STS for 2 years and the skin lesions have not recurred so far, despite the radiographic examinations showing no evidence of vascular improvement. From this case, we demonstrate the long-term benefit and safety of using STS, in a patient with severe manifestations of calciphylaxis.