Back
In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and normal or slightly impaired renal function, the use of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is preferable to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the efficacy, and safety of NOACs compared with VKAs are still unknown.
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials that compared the use of NOACs with VKAs for anticoagulation in patients with AF on dialysis therapy and that evaluated the following outcomes: (1) stroke; (2) major bleeding; (3) cardiovascular mortality; and (4) all-cause mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.7, and heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Three randomized controlled trials were included, comprising a total of 383 patients. Of these, 218 received NOACs (130 received apixaban; 88 received rivaroxaban), and 165 were treated with VKAs (116 received warfarin; 49 received phenprocoumon). The incidence of stroke was significantly lower in patients treated with NOACs (3.7%) compared with those using VKAs (7.3%) (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.93; p=0.03; I2=0%) (Figure 1A). However, the difference was not statistically significant in the case of ischemic stroke specifically (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.17-1.04; p=0.06; I2=0%) (Figure 1B). As for the major bleeding outcome, the NOAC group (14.2%) had fewer events than the VKA group (18.2%) but without statistical significance (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.44-1.07; p=0.10; I2=18%). There was no significant difference between groups regarding cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.23; 95% CI 0.66-2.29; p=0.52; I2=13%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.77-1.24; p=0.84; I2=16%).
This meta-analysis suggests that in patients with AF on dialysis, the use of NOACs was associated with a significant reduction in stroke and a numerically lower incidence of major bleeding than VKAs.