RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VOLUME STATUS BY CLINICAL CRITERIA AND LUNG ULTRASOUND IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1099/f318fd3064fc6971a8699c55833df96b.pdf
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VOLUME STATUS BY CLINICAL CRITERIA AND LUNG ULTRASOUND IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS
Lynn Htet
Aung
Khin Phyu Pyar khinphyupyar@gmail.com Defence Services Medical Academy Nephrology Yangon
Sai Aik Hla saiaikhla@gmail.com No.2 Defence Services General Hospitaln (1000 bedded) Nephrology Nay Pyi Taw
Zarni Htet Aung znha474@gmail.com No.1 Defence Services General Hospitaln (1000 bedded) Nephrology Yangon
Myo Min Thant myomint07@gmail.com No.2 Military Hospital (700 bedded) Nephrology Aung Ban
Aung Zaw Htet aungzawhtetdr@gmail.com No.1 Defence Services General Hospitaln (1000 bedded) Nephrology Yangon
Myo Maung Maung dr.myomaungmaung@gmail.com No.2 Defence Services General Hospitaln (1000 bedded) Nephrology Nay Pyi Taw
Kyaw Thurein Lwin drkyawthuyeinlwin@gmail.com No.1 Defence Services General Hospitaln (1000 bedded) Nephrology Yangon
Min Aung Hein minaunghein1984@gmail.com No.1 Defence Services General Hospitaln (1000 bedded) Nephrology Yangon
Ye Min Hein dr.yeminhein@gmail.com Defence Services Medical Academy Nephrology Yangon
Lay Maung Maung laymgmg082@gmail.com Defence Services Medical Academy Nephrology Yangon
Moe Htun Zaw moetunzaw2011@gmail.com Defence Services Medical Academy Nephrology Yangon
 
 
 
 

Dry weight is indeed an essential part of the management of hemodialysis patients. In the assessment of dry weight, clinical dry weight determent is often difficult. Lung ultrasound can be assessed for fluid status by detecting extravascular lung water congestion as B line score. This study aimed to study the relationship of volume status between clinical criteria and lung ultrasound in hemodialysis patients.

 A hospital-based before and after comparative study done in No. (1) Defence Services General Hospital, Hemodialysis unit. Yangon from October 2020 to June 2023. Total 52 participants were included. Before and after hemodialysis, all participants underwent assessments using both clinical examination and lung ultrasound.

Before HD, among the patients, a group of 29 individuals was classified as hypervolemic based on clinical criteria (n=29): 27.6% exhibited a severe degree of volume overload by lung ultrasound (USG). 69.0% showed a moderate degree of volume overload. Only 3.4% had a mild degree of volume overload All of the hypervolemic patients had a positive degree of volume overload in the lung USG score. For patients classified as euvolemic based on clinical criteria (n=23): There were no cases of severe or moderate volume overload. 56.5% showed a mild degree of volume overload. 43.5% had an absent degree of volume overload. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) value of 0.883, p < 0.001.

After hemodialysis (HD), among the patients, a group of 20 individuals was classified as hypervolemic based on clinical criteria (n=20): five percent displayed a severe level of volume overload. 70.0% exhibited a moderate level of volume overload. 25.0% showed a mild level of volume overload. None of the hypervolemic patients had an absent level of volume overload after HD. After HD, for patients classified as euvolemic based on clinical criteria (n=32): There were no cases of severe volume overload.18.8% showed a moderate degree of volume overload. 31.2% had a mild degree of volume overload. 50.0% had an absent degree of volume overload. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) value of 0.622, p < 0.001.


There was a strong relationship between clinical volume status and the degree of volume overload assessed by lung ultrasound in hemodialysis patients. Before hemodialysis, the correlation was particularly robust, suggesting that clinical evaluation and lung ultrasound can effectively complement each other in assessing volume status and volume overload severity.

E-Poster Format Requirements
  • PDF file
  • Layout: Portrait (vertical orientation)
  • One page only (Dim A4: 210 x 297mm or PPT)
  • E-Poster can be prepared in PowerPoint (one (1) PowerPoint slide) but must be saved and submitted as PDF file.
  • File Size: Maximum file size is 2 Megabytes (2 MB)
  • No hyperlinks, animated images, animations, and slide transitions
  • Language: English
  • Include your abstract number
  • E-posters can include QR codes, tables and photos