INITIAL EXPERIENCE OF DIFFERENT CATHETER INSERTION METHODS FOR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS UNDER PMNDP FROM TWO GOVERNMENT CENTRES

8 Feb 2025 12 a.m. 12 a.m.
WCN25-AB-3921, Poster Board= SAT-559

Introduction:

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a vital home-based renal replacement therapy, particularly important in resource-limited settings. This study aims to evaluate PD program under the Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Program (PMNDP) at the Department of Nephrology, Medical College Hospital & North Bengal Medical College Hospital. The focus is on the efficacy of different catheter insertion methods in these two centres, in a prospective observational study conducted from January to July 2024.

Methods:

Study Site: Department of Nephrology, Medical College Hospital & North Bengal Medical College Hospital, WestBengal

Study Period: January to July 2024

Prospective observational study evaluating PD catheter insertion methods under support of PMNDP

Participants: 20 patients (12 males, 8 females)

Native Kidney Disease: DM (7), CGN (6), Alport (1), Unknown (6)

Baseline Characteristics:

Residual renal output: Mean 800 ml

Average BP medications: 4

No prior abdominal surgery

PD-first policy: 16 patients

Access crisis: 4 patients

Catheter Insertion Methods:

Blind Verres needle insertion: 6

Dissection with pull-apart sheath: 10

Stylet-based insertion without pull-apart sheath: 4

Results:

Primary success rate: CAPD initiation was successful in 75% of cases (15/20) after two weeks of catheterization.

Complications requiring repeat primary reinsertion:

Migration: 1 patient

Omental wrap: 1 patient

Outflow failure: 2 patients

Shifting to hemodialysis (HD): 1 patient

6-month follow-up of 5 patients showed:

Kt/V: Average 1.7

Creatinine clearance (CrCl): 85 ml/min

 

Insertion Method

Patients

Primary Success

Complications (Reinsertions)

Verres Needle Insertion

6

5

1 (Outflow failure)

Dissection with Pull-Apart Sheath

10

8

2 (Migration, Omental wrap)

Stylet-Based Insertion

4

2

2 (Outflow failure)

The results of the chi-square test comparing the three catheter insertion methods are as follows:

Chi-square value (χ²): 1.69

Degrees of freedom (df): 2

p-value: 0.43

Interpretation:

With a p-value of 0.43, which is greater than 0.05, the test indicates that there is no statistically significant difference in the success rates among the three catheter insertion methods (Verres needle, dissection with pull-apart sheath, and stylet-based insertion).

This suggests that the choice of insertion method did not significantly impact the likelihood of successful CAPD initiation in this study

Conclusions:

Promising initial success of various catheter insertion methods by nephrologist for PD program under PMNDP

Limitations:

Lack of varying size catheters and pull-apart sheaths

Need for robust long-term outcome data

Adherence to hand hygiene to prevent peritonitis

Supply challenges for remotely located patients

Government support benefits:

Major interest among economically disadvantaged

Continuation of schooling and farming with ongoing RRT

No Conflict of interest

I have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

I did not use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.